The Incarnation of the Word, based on the Classic writings of Essay

The Incarnation of the Word, based on the Classic writings of Athanasius - Essay Example On the other hand, Trinitarianism was the theological approach that Athanasius advocated for that defines God as being three divine persons constituting of the Father, Jesus as the Son and the third person as the Holy Spirit. In one of Athanasius’ recognized literature, this theologian sought to explain the principle reasons why God incarnated in the flesh, which was the purpose of the converting the sinful to holiness. With this, this essay will summarize the main points embedded in Athanasius’ theology and also give an insightful analysis of the principal points that Athanasius discussed about incarnation. One of the key concepts that v communicated in his doctrine was the fact that man could never understand the ways of God despite him being created in His divine image. However, man has the opportunity of understanding how his maker functions through His grace and in this knowledge, man is able to live and prosper. Principally, Athanasius intimates that it is Godâ₠¬â„¢s desire for man to know Him and for man to revere in His delight in which the creation of the universe was for the sole purpose of self-revelation. In essence, God’s word is an eternal factor in which everything that God created was because of the word in which God allowed the word to be flesh in order for it to accomplish purpose on earth1. Further, God’s undying love for humanity led him to incarnate into the human form as this was a sign that he cared for the souls that were to die in eternal damnation because of the separation that existed between man and God. A known fact is that God is an invisible, but omnipotent because he exists in nature, but man cannot term Him as nature because is His own creation and He cannot be created. According to the theory of creation, everything that God created was a result of a command by word of mouth and it became existent meaning that His word can command things to be existent. Therefore, God used the creation through His word to allow man to try to get an insight about the nature of God meaning that His works speak for Him because of His invisible nature. The hidden meaning of this statement is that an artist’s work tends to stand out even in his absentia in which no man should argue should argue that He is not there because He is invisible. Subsequently, God created nature and all that is in it in order for man to have the knowledge of whom God is and His nature making Himself known to men of all walks. Another significant aspect that Athanasius discussed in his doctrine was the fact that man could understand God’s nature in His invisible state through the order that He used when creating the universe and everything in it. In essence, God did not create the animals on the first day of creation but on the six because He is a God of order hence creating the earth and light on the first day. This means that to God things do not just happen, but they do occur because it is His plan hence allowing man to have the knowledge of how exactly God operates. The obvious doctrine that Athanasius did not stand for was the one in Aranius intimated that Jesus stood in between the deity while Athanasius advocates for the fact that Jesus is the mediator between God and His creation2. Theologists that came after Athanasius argued that Jesus had come to substitute the word, which was not true as Jesus became flesh through the word in order